Archive for May, 2009


Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "Quick Change Artists – Video", posted with vodpod


Read Full Post »

“The researchers recommended that all healthy people between the ages of 20 and 40 aim for four to six 30-second intense exercise bouts two times per week. A sprint outdoors or on a bicycle or simply running up a flight of stairs would suffice.”


Read Full Post »

Cancer Ignorance

From: http://www.drkelley.com/what_is_cancer.htm

Cancer Ignorance


Carol Morrison-Kelley, M.D., F.A.C.C.
William D. Kelley, D.D.S., M.S.


We are all ignorant – on different subjects. We all remain ignorant until we can accept the facts.   Most of us choose to remain ignorant – it’s stylish.  All of us doctors choose to remain ignorant – it’s most profitable.  Over the past several years, being plunged into this cancer zoo, it has come to our consciousness that patients (i.e., Cancer victims) are more intelligent than we doctors.

There is not one doctor in the world today who treats cancer.  First of all, it takes common sense.  Second, it is against the law – against the E establishment’s wishes.  Third, most doctors do not know what cancer is and deliberately, with malice aforethought, choose to remain ignorant on the subject.  Fourth, it is impossible for a doctor to treat your cancer – only you can treat your cancer.

What is Cancer?

Without question, cancer is one of the simplest disease processes to properly treat.  Cancer’s simplicity is the cloak it hides under – right out in plain sight.  You certainly do not need a college degree to figure that out – just a little common sense.  We have been deceived by the dishonest medical establishment – con-artistry at its finest!  All the white coats with stethoscopes hanging around their necks hide behind surgical masks with MRI scans and laboratory reports in hand that are nothing more than theatrical props.  We are the entertainment-crazed generation – paying our all for it and we love it so.

Some of us become disillusioned and bored with the prim and proper orthodox theatre then run as fast as we can and pay the remaining few breaths we own to the vulgar, tell it like it is, alternative theatre.

Some of you (very, very few) may discern what cancer is, and is not, and will live a long and healthy life; at age 95 succumbing to gunshot wounds inflicted by a jealous lover.  That is our wish for all of you.

What Cancer is Not

Cancer is not those lumps and bumps that we have been so programmed to fear and freak out over if we find one on our body.  Cancer is not a malignant tumor mass, which doctors, in their cancer ignorance, erroneously call cancer.  This is one of the reasons we have so much “cancer”.  The physician does not know what cancer is.  How could he properly treat it?  The physicians, both orthodox and alternative, only know how to mistreat malignant tumor masses and blood and lymph abnormalities which is not even cancer.

What Cancer Is

Cancer is a process – not an object.   Daily, everyone produces malignant tumor cells and daily, most everyone’s pancreas produces adequate pancreatin to digest the food they eat and the normally-developing malignant tumor cells.  It is when one’s pancreas fails to produce the necessary pancreatin to accomplish these tasks that a disease process takes place which we correctly call cancer.

When this disease process occurs, one is not aware of it.  It is so subtle it must progress for 2 to 4 years before one, or one’s physician, realizes he or she is in trouble.  At first, the things one often complains about to his or her physician during this time are indigestion and weight loss.   Then, a few months later, excessive weight gain, eye trouble and often pyorrhea.   Eventually a large enough malignant tumor mass forms – which is the object the cancer victim and/or the physician sees and who, in error, calls cancer.  The malignant tumor masses are not cancer but malignant tumor masses.  The disease process, the failure of one’s pancreas, we correctly call cancer.

The object of Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure Program is to supply the body with adequate pancreatin to properly digest food, stop this disease process, and rid the body of any and all malignant tumor cells.  This is the proper, normal, physiological method of taking care of the disease process we correctly call cancer.

Cancer and Common Sense

Not even the dumbest pre-schooler is so ignorant to call a banana an apple.  Yet we doctors, in our cancer ignorance, in our stupidity, in our gross error, call malignant tumor masses cancer.  We get up every morning and look in the mirror and ask, “Just how ignorant can we educated ignoramuses be?”  We do not know the difference between cancer and a malignant tumor.   We roam the subways in search of transatlantic flights to Paris.

A diabetic going untreated will destroy his liver, kidneys, lungs, develop a gangrenous limb and go blind.  The physician who performs a liver, lung and kidney transplant is not treating diabetes.  The physician who amputates the gangrenous limb is not treating diabetes.  The physician who prescribes a “seeing-eye dog” is not treating diabetes.  The physician who describes insulin is not treating diabetes.  The diabetic who gives himself insulin and changes his diet is properly treating his own diabetic condition.

The cancer victim going untreated will die a horrible, painful death.  The orthodox physician who uses surgery, radiation and chemotherapy is not treating cancer.  The alternative “doctor” who prescribes herbs, shark cartilage, black salve, laetrile, vitamins, etc. is not treating cancer.  The Chinese doctor who prescribes 6 cockroaches and 3 grasshoppers daily is not treating cancer.   These items may help something else in one’s body, but will not properly treat one’s cancer.

Should these quacks even prescribe pancreatin for the cancer victim, they are not treating cancer.  The cancer victim must treat himself by taking a safe, effective, and uncontaminated form of pancreatin in adequate dosages and change his diet. The quacks of our society are not permitted to treat cancer, should they choose to or even know how.  The quacks of our society are only permitted to treat malignant tumors and one’s purse.

The great charlatans of our civilization like Wm. Rockefeller, Sr. with his snake oil, P.T. Barnum with his circus, Barney Cornfield with his investment and insurance schemes, must look down from heaven or up from hell, green with envy and jealously.  They must beg God for a chance to be a modern-day physician.

By the time you and/or your physician discover a malignant tumor mass, you have had cancer for 2 or more years.  You have to face the truth that cancer is nothing more than the failure of your pancreas to produce adequate pancreatin and your body to deliver it to the site of an injury or stimulated normal Trophoblact (pre-placenta) cancer cell.


All persons who have cancer die of starvation
unless they are first killed – usually by their physician.

The cancer victim does not have to be a party to his own plunder and murder.  He must properly treat his own cancer as he is the only one who can.  He must embark on a Do-It-Yourself program.   The cancer victim wants someone else to do it for him.  However, that is impossible for only the cancer victim himself can properly treat his own cancer.

For the time being, it is not illegal to treat one’s own self.  How long will the medical establishment permit it?  Only God knows.

Obtaining a supply of pancreatin should be considered by those who are wise enough to realize wealth is not determined in silver, gold or diamonds.  Health is also an important asset.

In 1904, only 1 out of 24 Americans had cancer in his lifetime.  In the 35 years since Dr. Kelley cured himself of terminal pancreatic cancer and guided some 33,000 cancer victims to health, the cancer rate has increased from 1 out of 5 to now, as you read this, when the cancer rate is 1 out of 2 in men and 2 out of 3 in women – it has been so planned.  And the cancer industry calls this progress against cancer – a lie, a big lie.  The medical establishment industry using their establishment media takes their living off of cancer.  They thrive on cancer.  More of these plundering, murdering, deceiving creatures live off of cancer than those cancer victims who die.  Cancer is one of the medical establishment’s many techniques of deceiving, plundering and murdering.  The war on cancer is the plundering, murdering war declared upon our peoples, not a war on cancer.  In the spring of each and every year, the media bombards us with “We almost have the cure for cancer.  In just a year or so, this new drug will be available.”  “We need more research money for the National Cancer Institute.”  “Give, give to the American Cancer Society.”  This is only one of the establishment’s big plundering lies.  And we naive, ignorant, innocent deceived Americans fall for it.

Cancer Recovery

In attempting to find help and in helping others, one must comprehend the four basic parameters one confronts:

First, the stricken cancer victim and their family members have been so deceived by the establishment that they are completely brainwashed and placed in overwhelming fear.

Second, another parameter we often forget is, once a cancer victim or family member has awakened from this imprisoned condition – they trust no one.  All too often, the mind set of the cancer victim is to demand an immediate, noticeable, positive, and measurable response.  When this is not forthcoming, they usually flip and flounder around, in and out of all forms of therapies that they are claimed by their promoters as the cure.  Usually, most of the individuals who finally find Dr. Kelley’s Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure Program are those disappointed and disillusioned persons without hope and adequate funding for recovery.   Such persons must have at least 6 months of life and follow the Metabolic Program most carefully.  Then, if they survive that long, there is a chance of recovery.   This recovery period is a long and tedious one, usually lasting at least 2 years.   After that, they must take a form of metabolic support for the remainder of their lives.

Third, most of these individuals expect and demand immediate results or they go on to other therapies.  This, however, is not the way one recovers from cancer and malignant tumor masses.  It is not the way they develop cancer and malignant tumor masses.  It requires the failure of the pancreas from 2 to 4 years to develop a malignant tumor mass which the ignorant medical community in total error calls cancer.  It requires at least the same length of time to clean up a ravaged body.  Then the process of rebuilding the body can take place, which usually takes an additional two to four years of hard work and living right.  Then, for the balance of one’s life, one must keep constant vigil to remain free of malignant tumor masses.

Fourth, one must realize that physicians are forbidden to treat cancer.  The enemy-controlled medical establishment has several methods and techniques to prohibit a physician from treating cancer.  Physicians are only allowed to treat malignant tumor masses and one’s purse. We have experienced most of these diabolical acts of injustice, not only as cancer victims, but also as physicians.

The Do-It-Yourself Process

Only you, yourself, can properly treat cancer.  As stated, it is a fact that cancer is a process.  In addressing the process of cancer, what happens?  Pancreatin digest the malignant tumor masses and cells into liquid debris.  This debris is then gobbled up by your white blood cells and removed from your body by way of bile from the liver. This goes into the colon and out, and urine from the kidneys travels through the bladder and out.  A small amount of this debris leaves the body by way of skin perspiration as well as hair and nail growth.

Getting Well

Upon starting the Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure Program, two measurable things occur:

  1. White blood cells increase in number, which is considered by everyone to be a good sign.

  2. Cancer markers become temporarily elevated, which often scares both the cancer victim and his or her doctor.  We consider elevated cancer markers to be a good sign for the following reason:

The malignant tumor mass debris consists, in part, of cancer marker components.   Until now, most of this cancer marker material has been held in the tissue surrounding the malignant tumor mass and usually increases when malignant tumor masses continue to develop.  Upon starting Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure Program, the cancer markers are released into the bloodstream as the masses are digested.  This causes a high volume of cancer marker material to appear in the bloodstream temporarily and is the most misinterpreted part of the Metabolic Medicine’s Cancer Cure Program.   The second most interpreted part is that often the malignant tumor masses continue to grow temporarily before one’s normal metabolic function can take over.

Feeling Bad During Recovery

When the organs of detoxification become overloaded with debris, one feels lousy – like you were run over by a freight train.   This lousy feeling is how you will know that our Metabolic Medicine’s Program is working.  If you do not feel lousy, one of two things is happening:

  1. You are not taking enough pancreatin of the correct quality or quantity.

  2. You have a very small amount of malignant tumor cells and/or masses.

We expect all cancer victims taking pancreatin to feel toxic (sore, headachy, no energy, nauseous, irritable, elevated temperature, flu-like symptoms, etc.).  When this occurs it indicates one’s metabolic functions are working well.  At this time, we recommend that you stop taking the metabolic nutrients for 5 days to allow your organs of detoxification time to remove this debris from your body.

Many cancer victims have only a small malignant tumor mass and experience only mild discomfort while other cancer victims have very large malignant tumor masses.  If your physician surgically removes most of such masses, one’s recovery time speeds up.

Let’s make Cancer Victors out of all Cancer Victims!

Home Page

Read Full Post »

Nutrition: Lipoic Acid

From: here

Lipoic Acid

an extremely potent and important antioxidant

The hot potato team

You know already that vitamin C, vitamin E and many other substances protect the body from damage from free radicals. A free radical is a molecule that wants to give an electron to other molecules. As it does this, it alters them and damages the system. Vitamin E, for example, can take an electron from a free radical to neutralize it. Once vitamin E has done that, we describe that as an oxidized vitamin E and it can no longer work as a free-radical scavenger.

In other words, the antioxidant vitamin E is used up whenever it quenches a free-radical.

Nature, however, has a cunning plan. She uses vitamin C can regenerate the vitamin E and make it ready to go again. And then she uses lipoic acid to regenerate the vitamin C, and something else to regenerate the lipoic acid. This hot potato method allows rapid quenching of the free radical with more leisurely disposal of the free radical.

Team Specialists

Another reason to have several members of the team is that each member has different areas of the body in which it works.

Vitamin E is soluble in membranes. Vitamin C is soluble in the cell fluids between the membranes. Lipoic acid is unique in that it can move easily from the fatty part of the body to the watery part. Glutathione is especially suited to reduce free-radical damage inside the nucleus of the cell.


Glutathione is a word that you’ll no doubt learn over the ensuing few years as it hits the mainstream media. Glutathione is present in the interior of all our cells. Higher levels are correlated with lower levels of cancer. Glutathion glutathion you can remember this word.

Gene p53

Now think about genetics, and the genetic codes in our DNA that determine our eye color, and height, and all the details of our makeup and metabolism. A gene is one particular genetic code with a particular function. We all have a gene called p53. When is active, our body is active at suppressing cancer. If p53 is low then we are more likely to develop cancer. Viruses that predispose to cancer often work by inactivating gene p53. Radiation or carcinogens sometimes cause cancer by damaging the p53 gene so that it cannot work properly. To quote one cancer researcher, “Mutations in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene are common in diverse types of cancer.[i]” High levels of intracellular free-radicals impair the function of p53. Glutathione (remember this word) is important in keeping p53 levels high. And thereby reducing the risk of cancer. (Gene p53, by the way, recently made it onto the cover of Newsweek. Don’t ever think that the “little guy” doesn’t get recognition, because the role of gene p53 in prevention of cancer finally made the national news!)

And, the final piece of the puzzle, lipoic acid is intimately involved with recycling glutathione which protects gene p53.

So lipoic acid is important in that it recycles and regenerates many of the antioxidants in the cell as well as being a powerful antioxidant itself. In my opinion, lipoic acid will come to be recognized as more effective than vitamin C or E in prevention of cancer in the average healthy person. (I still suggest vitamin C as well.)

Therapeutic use of lipoic acid for liver diseases

Deadly mushrooms and the liver

Lipoic acid was first used in clinical medicine to treat people with Amanita mushroom poisoning. This can destroy the liver in a matter of days. Generally only 10-50 % of people with amanita mushroom poisoning survive.

Now lipoic acid is used for people poisoned with amanita mushrooms. One group of 75 patients was treated with lipoic acid. Of them, 67 survived, almost 90%.

Hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus uses an enzyme called reverse transcriptase to copy itself into the gene of the cells it infects. Lipoic acid is a potent inhibitor of reverse transcriptase, as is ascorbic acid. My patients with hepatitis C show lower levels of liver inflammation when they take lipoic acid.

Therapeutic use of lipoic acid for other conditions

Prevention of cancer

Healthy adults who wish to decrease risk of cancer will benefit from lipoic acid 100 milligrams two to four times a day. See discussion above


Lipoic acid is used in people with diabetes for two purposes.

  1. One is that it reduces levels of blood glucose.
  2. The second is that it prevents some of the complications of high blood sugar. The tissue damage in people with diabetes is due to the high levels of glucose, causing glucose to attach to proteins in the body and make them work less well. Lipoic acid interferes with the attachment of sugar to proteins in the body. Glucose, although is an important fuel for us, is regulated in a fairly tight range. Too little and our brain stops functioning and we will faint with hypoglycemia. Too much and the sugar molecules will start reacting chemically with other proteins in the body and cause them to lose their capacity to function. In the case of the nerves this can result in nerve damage; in the case of the kidneys they function less well; in the case of the eye vision is impaired; in the case of blood vessels they develop arteriosclerosis. So, if we can keep the blood glucose normal, we can prevent these complications.
  3. Lipoic acid has been used in Germany for over 20 years to treat the nerve damage from diabetes.
  4. Diabetics are also prone to cataract formation. A cataract is a condition in which the transparent lens of the eye becomes less transparent, something like fog on your bathroom window when you take a hot shower. Evidence from animals in the laboratory indicates that lipoic acid prevents this.


In one study of 45 patients with stage I and II open angle glaucoma, 150 mg of lipoic acid a day resulted in greater improvement in visual function compared to patients taking placebo.

Stroke and Heart Attack

Stroke and heart attack are both illnesses in which occlusion of a blood vessel results in damage to the tissue nourished by that blood vessel. Animal studies show that lipoic acid greatly diminishes the area of tissue thas injured when the blood supply is cut off. Animals given lipoic acid had only 1/3 the death rate from stroke compared to those not so treated.

Safety of Lipoic acid

No serious side effects from lipoic acid have appeared in over thirty years of scientific research and therapeutic use


Some people with diabetes have developed hypoglycemia because the lipoic acid improved their glucose handling. Any person with diabetes should take supplements only under supervision of their physician.

Other people have developed allergic skin conditions. If a person is deficient in thiamine (vitamin B1) they should not take lipoic acid until their thiamine deficiency is treated. Thiamine deficiency can cause loss of appetite, confusion, constipation, depression, digestive disturbances, fatigue, irritability, memory loss, weakness, nervousness, loss of sensation, pain, shortness of breath, and sensitivity to sound.

Dose of lipoic acid

Lipoic acid tends to wash out of the blood stream quickly, so you benefit more by spreading out the dose to two to four times a day. I suggest a total daily dose of at least 500 milligrams. Eight hundred would certainly be safe and more beneficial.

Read Full Post »

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about "Factory Farming causes Swine Flu", posted with vodpod

Read Full Post »

Here’s an excellent article from Mercola about what I am calling the “Swine Flu Hoax”
Click here for original article:
Disponible en Espanol

American health officials declared a public health emergency as cases of swine flu were confirmed in the U.S. Health officials across the world fear this could be the leading edge of a global pandemic emerging from Mexico, where seven people are confirmed dead as a result of the new virus.

On Wednesday April 29th, the World Health Organization (WHO) raised its pandemic alert level to five on its six-level threat scale,1 which means they’ve determined that the virus is capable of human-to-human transmission. The initial outbreaks across North America reveal an infection already traveling at higher velocity than did the last official pandemic strain, the 1968 Hong Kong flu.

Phase 5 had never been declared since the warning system was introduced in 2005 in response to the avian influenza crisis. Phase 6 means a pandemic is under way.

Several nations have imposed travel bans, or made plans to quarantine air travelers2 that present symptoms of the swine flu despite the fact that WHO now openly states it is not possible to contain the spread of this infection and recommends mitigation measures, not restricting travel or closing borders.

Just What is a Pandemic Anyway?

A pandemic does not necessarily mean what you think it does, it is NOT black-plague carts being hauled through the streets piled high with dead bodies. Nor does it mean flesh eating zombies wandering the streets feeding on the living. All a pandemic means is that a new infectious disease is spreading throughout the world.

By definition, a “pandemic” is an epidemic that is geographically widespread. Fear-mongers are always careful to add the innuendo that millions of people could and probably will die, as in the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918 that killed about 20 million people worldwide.

How does the death of even a few hundred equate to 20 million?swine flu

Much Fear Mongering Being Promoted

I suspect you have likely been alarmed by the media’s coverage of the swine flu scare. It has a noticeable subplot – preparing you for draconian measures to combat a future pandemic as well as forcing you to accept the idea of mandatory vaccinations.

On April 27, Time magazine published an article which discusses how dozens died and hundreds were injured from vaccines as a result of the 1976 swine flu fiasco, when the Ford administration attempted to use the infection of soldiers at Fort Dix as a pretext for a mass vaccination of the entire country.

Despite acknowledging that the 1976 farce was an example of “how not to handle a flu outbreak”, the article still introduces the notion that officials “may soon have to consider whether to institute draconian measures to combat the disease”.

Fear has become so widespread that Egypt has ordered the slaughter of the country’s 300,000 pigs, even though no cases have been reported there. At least this threatened epidemic has provided a source of amusement as it has generated even more ludicrous behavior.

Fortunately some respectable journalists recognize this and are seeking to spread a voice of reason to the fear that is being promoted in the majority of the media.

This is NOT the First Swine Flu Panic

My guess is that you can expect to see a lot of panic over this issue in the near future. But the key is to remain calm — this isn’t the first time the public has been warned about swine flu. The last time was in 1976, right before I entered medical school and I remember it very clearly. It resulted in the massive swine flu vaccine campaign.

Do you happen to recall the result of this massive campaign?

Within a few months, claims totaling $1.3 billion had been filed by victims who had suffered paralysis from the vaccine. The vaccine was also blamed for 25 deaths.

However, several hundred people developed crippling Guillain-Barré Syndrome after they were injected with the swine flu vaccine. Even healthy 20-year-olds ended up as paraplegics.

And the swine flu pandemic itself? It never materialized.

More People Died From the Swine Flu Vaccine than Swine Flu!

It is very difficult to forecast a pandemic, and a rash response can be extremely damaging.

To put things into perspective, malaria kills 3,000 people EVERY DAY, and it’s considered “a health problem”… But of course, there are no fancy vaccines for malaria that can rake in billions of dollars in a short amount of time.

One Australian news source,3 for example, states that even a mild swine flu epidemic could lead to the deaths of 1.4 million people and would reduce economic growth by nearly $5 trillion dollars.

Give me a break, if this doesn’t sound like the outlandish cries of the pandemic bird-flu I don’t know what does. Do you remember when President Bush said two million Americans would die as a result of the bird flu?

In 2005, in 2006, 2007, and again in 2008, those fears were exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear, and line the pocketbooks of various individuals and industry. I became so convinced by the evidence AGAINST the possibility of a bird flu pandemic that I wrote a New York Times bestselling book, The Bird Flu Hoax, all about the massive fraud involved with the epidemic that never happened.

swine fluWhat is the Swine Flu?

Regular swine flu is a contagious respiratory disease, caused by a type-A influenza virus that affects pigs. The current strain, A(H1N1), is a new variation of an H1N1 virus — which causes seasonal flu outbreaks in humans — that also contains genetic material of bird and pig versions of the flu.

Symptoms include:

  • Fever of more than 100
  • Coughing
  • Runny nose and/or sore throat
  • Joint aches
  • Severe headache
  • Vomiting and/or diarrhea
  • Lethargy
  • Lack of appetite

Interestingly enough, this version has never before been seen in neither human nor animal, which I will discuss a bit later.

This does sound bad. But not so fast. There are a few reasons to not rush to conclusions that this is the deadly pandemic we’ve been told would occur in the near future (as if anyone could predict it without having some sort of inside knowledge).

Current State of Swine Flu Spread

As of May 8, 2009, 24 countries have officially reported 2,384 cases of influenza A(H1N1) infection and only 44 deaths in the ENTIRE world from this illness. At this time 43 of the deaths are from people born in Mexico.

Why Mexico?  Well overcrowding, poor nutrition and overall poor immunity, all of which are indigenous to Mexico will radically increase your risk of death from almost any infection.

Interestingly there are no official reports of just who these people are that died. Are they elderly or infirm people, are they already chronically ill? Are they under 5 years old? Or perhaps someone who could just as easily be killed by the common cold or a slip and fall? These are important questions that have not been answered.

The number of fatalities, and suspected and confirmed cases across the world change depending on the source, so your best bet — if you want the latest numbers — is to use Google Maps’ Swine Flu Tracker. There is also an experimental version for Mexico.

But “officially’ the most recent numbers according to the World Health Organization’s Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response site are:

Country Cases Deaths
Mexico 1,112 42
United States 896 1*
Canada 214 0
Spain 81 0
United Kingdom 32 0
Germany 10 0
Israel 6 0
France 5 0
Italy 5 0
New Zealand 5 0
El Salvador 2 0
Korea 3 0
Netherlands 2 0
Austria 1 0
China 1 0
Costa Rica 1 0
Colombia 1 0
Denmark 1 0
Guatemala 1 0
Ireland 1 0
Poland 1 0
Portugal 1 0
Sweden 1 0
Switzerland 1 0

*The United States has had 896 confirmed cases, and two deaths. On April 29th CNN reported the first swine fatality in the US, however this was actually a toddler whose family had recently crossed from Mexico into Texas.

Swine Flu is a WEAK Virus

It is important to note that nearly all suspected new cases have been reported as mild. Preliminary scientific evidence is also pointing out that this virus is NOT as potent as initially thought.

Wired Magazine reported on May 4 that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory computer scientists did not find similarities between swine flu and historical strains that spread widely, with catastrophic effect. Their findings are based on just one complete sample and several fragmentary samples of swine flu, but fit with two other early analyses.

Personally, I am highly skeptical. It simply doesn’t add up to a real pandemic.

But it does raise serious questions about where this brand new, never before seen virus came from, especially since it cannot be contracted from eating pork products, and has never before been seen in pigs, and contains traits from the bird flu — and which, so far, only seems to respond to Tamiflu. Are we just that lucky, or… what?

Your Fear Will Make Some People VERY Rich in Today’s Crumbling Economy

Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate) is approved for treatment of uncomplicated influenza A and B in children 1 year of age or older. It is also approved for prevention of influenza in people 13 years or older. It’s part of a group of anti-influenza drugs called neuraminidase inhibitors, which work by blocking a viral enzyme that helps the influenza virus to invade cells in your respiratory tract.

According to the Associated Press at least one financial analyst estimates up to $388 million worth of Tamiflu sales in the near future10 — and that’s without a pandemic outbreak.

More than half a dozen pharmaceutical companies, including Gilead Sciences Inc., Roche, GlaxoSmithKline and other companies with a stake in flu treatments and detection, have seen a rise in their shares in a matter of days, and will likely see revenue boosts if the swine flu outbreak continues to spread.

Swine flue is extremely convenient for governments that would have very soon have to dispose of billions of dollars of Tamiflu stock, which they bought to counter avian flu, or H5N1.  The US government ordered 20 million doses, costing $2 billion, in October, 2005, and around that time the UK government ordered 14.6 million doses.  Tamiflu’s manufacturer, Roche, has confirmed that the shelf life of its anti-viral is three years.

As soon as Homeland Security declared a health emergency, 25 percent — about 12 million doses — of Tamiflu and Relenza treatment courses were released from the nation’s stockpile. However, beware that the declaration also allows unapproved tests and drugs to be administered to children. Many health- and government officials are more than willing to take that chance with your life, and the life of your child. But are you?

Tamiflu Loaded With Side Effects, Including Death and Can Only Reduce Symptoms by 36 Hours at BEST

Please realize that Tamiflu is NOT a safe drug  Serious side effects include convulsions, delirium or delusions, and 14 deaths in children and teens as a result of neuropsychiatric problems and brain infections  Japan actually banned Tamiflu for children in 2007.

Remember, Tamiflu went through some rough times not too long ago, as the dangers of this drug came to light when, in 2007, the FDA finally began investigating some 1,800 adverse event reports related to the drug.

Additionally common side effects of Tamiflu include:

  • Nausea
  • Vomiting
  • Diarrhea
  • Headache
  • Dizziness
  • Fatigue
  • Cough

All in all, the very symptoms you’re trying to avoid.

Additionally, Tamiflu has been reported to be ineffective against seasonal flu outbreaks, and may not be sufficient to combat an epidemic or pandemic.

But making matters worse, some patients with influenza are at HIGHER risk for secondary bacterial infections when on Tamiflu. And secondary bacterial infections, as I mentioned earlier, was likely the REAL cause of the mass fatalities during the 1918 pandemic!

But here’s the real kicker.

When Tamiflu is used as directed (twice daily for 5 days) it can ONLY reduce the duration of your influenza symptoms by 1 to 1 ½ days, according to the official data.

Why on earth would anyone want to take a drug that has a chance of killing you, was banned in Japan, is loaded with side effects that mimic the flu itself, costs over $100, and AT BEST can only provide 36 hours of SYMPTOM relief.  Just doesn’t make any sense.

Should You Accept a Flu Vaccine — Just to be Safe?

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Watch the video above to see ridiculous 1976 commercials promoting Swine Flu shots.

As stated in the New York Times14 and elsewhere, flu experts have no idea whether the current seasonal flu vaccine would offer any protection whatsoever against this exotic mutant, and it will take months to create a new one.

But let me tell you, getting vaccinated now would not only offer no protection and potentially cause great harm, it would most likely be loaded with toxic mercury which is used as a preservative in most flu vaccines..

I’ve written extensively about the numerous dangers (and ineffectiveness) of flu vaccines, and why I do not recommend them to anyone. So no matter what you hear — even if it comes from your doctor — don’t get a regular flu shot. They rarely work against seasonal flu…and certainly can’t offer protection against a never-before- seen strain.

Currently, the antiviral drugs Tamiflu and Relenza are the only drugs that appear effective against the (human flu) H1N1 virus, and I strongly believe taking Tamiflu to protect yourself against this new virus could be a serious mistake — for all the reasons I already mentioned above.

But in addition to the dangerous side effects of Tamiflu, there is also growing evidence of resistance against the drug. In February, the pre-publication and preliminary findings journal called Nature Precedings published a paper on this concern, stating15:

The dramatic rise of oseltamivir [Tamiflu] resistance in the H1N1 serotype in the 2007/2008 season and the fixing of H274Y in the 2008/2009 season has raised concerns regarding individuals at risk for seasonal influenza, as well as development of similar resistance in the H5N1 serotype [bird flu].

Previously, oseltamivir resistance produced changes in H1N1 and H3N2 at multiple positions in treated patients. In contrast, the recently reported resistance involved patients who had not recently taken oseltamivir.

It’s one more reason not to bother with this potentially dangerous drug.

And, once a specific swine flu drug is created, you can be sure that it has not had the time to be tested in clinical trials to determine safety and effectiveness, which puts us right back where I started this article — with a potential repeat of the last dangerous swine flu vaccine, which destroyed the lives of hundreds of people.

Topping the whole mess off, of course, is the fact that if the new vaccine turns out to be a killer, the pharmaceutical companies responsible are immune from lawsuits — something I’ve also warned about before on numerous occasions.

Unfortunately, those prospects won’t stop the governments of the world from mandating the vaccine — a scenario I hope we can all avoid.

How to Protect Yourself Without Dangerous Drugs and Vaccinations

For now, my point is that there are always going to be threats of flu pandemics, real or created, and there will always be potentially toxic vaccines that are peddled as the solution. But you can break free of that whole drug-solution trap by following some natural health principles.

I have not caught a flu in over two decades, and you can avoid it too, without getting vaccinated, by following these simple guidelines, which will keep your immune system in optimal working order so that you’re far less likely to acquire the infection to begin with.

This is probably the single most important and least expensive action you can take. I would STRONGLY urge you to have your vitamin D level monitored to confirm your levels are therapeutic at 50-70 ng.ml and done by a reliable vitamin D lab like Lab Corp.

For those of you in the US we hope to launch a vitamin D testing service through Lab Corp that allows you to have your vitamin D levels checked at your local blood drawing facility, and relatively inexpensively. We hope to offer this service by June 2009.

If you are coming down with flu like symptoms and have not been on vitamin D you can take doses of 50,000 units a day for three days to treat the acute infection. Some researchers like Dr. Cannell, believe the dose could even be as high as 1000 units per pound of body weight for three days.

However, most of Dr. Cannell’s work was with seasonal and not pandemic flu. If your body has never been exposed to the antigens there is chance that the vitamin D might not work. However the best bet is to maintain healthy levels of vitamin D around 60 ng/ml.

BUT to keep this in perspective the regular flu, not the swine flu, has killed 13,000 in the US since January. But there is strong support that these types of figures are grossly exaggerated to increase vaccine sales. However, the fact remains that the regular flu at this point in time is FAR more dangerous than the swine flu and were you worried about the regular flu before the media started talking this up?

  • Avoid Sugar and Processed Foods. Sugar decreases the function of your immune system almost immediately, and as you likely know, a strong immune system is key to fighting off viruses and other illness. Be aware that sugar is present in foods you may not suspect, like ketchup and fruit juice.
  • Get Enough Rest. Just like it becomes harder for you to get your daily tasks done if you’re tired, if your body is overly fatigued it will be harder for it to fight the flu. Be sure to check out my article Guide to a Good Night’s Sleep for some great tips to help you get quality rest.
  • Have Effective Tools to Address Stress . We all face some stress every day, but if stress becomes overwhelming then your body will be less able to fight off the flu and other illness.If you feel that stress is taking a toll on your health, consider using an energy psychology tool such as the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT), which is remarkably effective in relieving stress associated with all kinds of events, from work to family to trauma. You can check out my free, 25-page EFT manual for some guidelines on how to perform EFT.
  • Exercise. When you exercise, you increase your circulation and your blood flow throughout your body. The components of your immune system are also better circulated, which means your immune system has a better chance of finding an illness before it spreads. You can review my exercise guidelines for some great tips on how to get started.
  • Take a good source of animal based omega-3 fats like Krill Oil. Increase your intake of healthy and essential fats like the omega-3 found in krill oil, which is crucial for maintaining health. It is also vitally important to avoid damaged omega-6 oils that are trans fats and in processed foods as it will seriously damage your immune response.
  • Wash Your Hands. Washing your hands will decrease your likelihood of spreading a virus to your nose, mouth or other people. Be sure you don’t use antibacterial soap for this — antibacterial soaps are completely unnecessary, and they cause far more harm than good. Instead, identify a simple chemical-free soap that you can switch your family to.
  • Eat Garlic Regularly. Garlic works like a broad-spectrum antibiotic against bacteria, virus, and protozoa in the body. And unlike with antibiotics, no resistance can be built up so it is an absolutely safe product to use. However, if you are allergic or don’t enjoy garlic it would be best to avoid as it will likely cause more harm than good.
  • Avoid Hospitals and Vaccines In this particular case, I’d also recommend you stay away from hospitals unless you’re having an emergency, as hospitals are prime breeding grounds for infections of all kinds, and could be one of the likeliest places you could be exposed to this new bug. Vaccines will not be available for six months at the minimum but when available they will be ineffective and can lead to crippling paralysis like Guillain-Barré Syndrome just as it did in the 70s.

Factory Farming Maybe Source of Swine Flu

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Another theory as to the cause of Swine Flu might be factory farming. In the United States, pigs travel coast to coast. They can be bred in North Carolina, fattened in the corn belt of Iowa, and slaughtered in California.

While this may reduce short-term costs for the pork industry, the highly contagious nature of diseases like influenza (perhaps made further infectious by the stresses of transport) needs to be considered when calculating the true cost of long-distance live animal transport.

The majority of U.S. pig farms now confine more than 5,000 animals each. With a group of 5,000 animals, if a novel virus shows up it will have more opportunity to replicate and potentially spread than in a group of 100 pigs on a small farm.

With massive concentrations of farm animals within which to mutate, these new swine flu viruses in North America seem to be on an evolutionary fast track, jumping and reassorting between species at an unprecedented rate.

Why a True Bird- or Swine Flu Pandemic is HIGHLY Unlikely

While in my opinion it is highly likely factory farming is responsible for producing this viral strain, I believe there is still no cause for concern.

You may not know this, but all H1N1 flu’s are descendants of the 1918 pandemic strain. The reason why the flu shot may or may not work, however, from year to year, is due to mutations. Therefore, there’s no vaccine available for this current hybrid flu strain, and naturally, this is feeding the fear that millions of people will die before a vaccine can be made.

However, let me remind you of one very important fact here.

Just a couple of months ago, scientists concluded that the 1918 flu pandemic that killed between 50-100 million people worldwide in a matter of 18 months — which all these worst case scenarios are built upon — was NOT due to the flu itself!4

Instead, they discovered the real culprit was strep infections.

People with influenza often get what is known as a “superinfection” with a bacterial agent. In 1918 it appears to have been Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Since strep is much easier to treat than the flu using modern medicine, a new pandemic would likely be much less dire than it was in the early 20th century, the researchers concluded.

Others, such as evolutionary biologist Paul Ewald,5 claim that a pandemic of this sort simply cannot happen, because in order for it to occur, the world has to change. Not the virus itself, but the world.

In a previous interview for Esquire magazine, in which he discusses the possibility of a bird flu pandemic, he states:

“They think that if a virus mutates, it’s an evolutionary event. Well, the virus is mutating because that is what viruses and other pathogens do. But evolution is not just random mutation. It is random mutation coupled with natural selection; it is a battle for competitive advantage among different strains generated by random mutation.

For bird flu to evolve into a human pandemic, the strain that finds a home in humanity has to be a strain that is both highly virulent and highly transmissible. Deadliness has to translate somehow into popularity; H5N1 has to find a way to kill or immobilize its human hosts, and still find other hosts to infect. Usually that doesn’t happen.”

Ewald goes on to explain that evolution in general is all about trade-offs, and in the evolution of infections the trade-off is between virulence and transmissibility.

What this means is that in order for a “bird flu” or “swine flu” to turn into a human pandemic, it has to find an environment that favors both deadly virulence and ease of transmission.

People living in squalor on the Western Front at the end of World War I generated such an environment, from which the epidemic of 1918 could arise.

Likewise, crowded chicken farms, slaughterhouses, and jam-packed markets of eastern Asia provide another such environment, and that environment gave rise to the bird flu — a pathogen that both kills and spreads, in birds, but not in humans.

Says Ewald:

“We know that H5N1 is well adapted to birds. We also know that it has a hard time becoming a virus that can move from person to person. It has a hard time without our doing anything. But we can make it harder. We can make sure it has no human population in which to evolve transmissibility. There is no need to rely on the mass extermination of chickens. There is no need to stockpile vaccines for everyone.

By vaccinating just the people most at risk — the people who work with chickens and the caregivers — we can prevent it from becoming transmissible among humans. Then it doesn’t matter what it does in chickens.”

Please remember that, despite the fantastic headlines and projections of MILLIONS of deaths, the H5N1 bird flu virus killed a mere 257 people worldwide since late 2003. As unfortunate as those deaths are, 257 deaths worldwide from any disease, over the course of five years, simply does not constitute an emergency worthy of much attention, let alone fear!

Honestly, your risk of being killed by a lightning strike in the last five years was about 2,300 percent higher than your risk of contracting and dying from the bird flu.6 I’m not kidding! In just one year (2004), more than 1,170 people died from lighting strikes, worldwide.7

So please, as the numbers of confirmed swine flu cases are released, keep a level head and don’t let fear run away with your brains.

Where did This Mysterious New Animal-Human Flu Strain Come From?

Alongside the fear-mongering headlines, I’ve also seen increasing numbers of reports questioning the true nature of this virus. And rightfully so.

Could a mixed animal-human mutant like this occur naturally? And if not, who made it, and how was it released?

Not one to dabble too deep in conspiracy theories, I don’t have to strain very hard to find actual facts to support the notion that this may not be a natural mutation, and that those who stand to gain have the wherewithal to pull off such a stunt.

Just last month I reported on the story that the American pharmaceutical company Baxter was under investigation for distributing the deadly avian flu virus to 18 different countries as part of a seasonal flu vaccine shipment. Czech reporters were probing to see if it may have been part of a deliberate attempt to start a pandemic; as such a “mistake” would be virtually impossible under the security protocols of that virus.

The H5N1 virus on its own is not very airborne. However, when combined with seasonal flu viruses, which are more easily spread, the effect could be a potent, airborne, deadly, biological weapon. If this batch of live bird flu and seasonal flu viruses had reached the public, it could have resulted in dire consequences.

There is a name for this mixing of viruses; it’s called “reassortment,” and it is one of two ways pandemic viruses are created in the lab. Some scientists say the most recent global outbreak — the 1977 Russian flu — was started by a virus created and leaked from a laboratory.

Another example of the less sterling integrity of Big Pharma is the case of Bayer, who sold millions of dollars worth of an injectable blood-clotting medicine to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries in the mid-1980s, even though they knew it was tainted with the AIDS virus.

So while it is morally unthinkable that a drug company would knowingly contaminate flu vaccines with a deadly flu virus such as the bird- or swine flu, it is certainly not impossible. It has already happened more than once.

But there seems to be no repercussions or hard feelings when industry oversteps the boundaries of morality and integrity and enters the arena of obscenity. Because, lo and behold, which company has been chosen to head up efforts, along with WHO, to produce a vaccine against the Mexican swine flu?

Baxter!11 Despite the fact that ink has barely dried on the investigative reports from their should-be-criminal “mistake” against humanity.

According to other sources,12 a top scientist for the United Nations, who has examined the outbreak of the deadly Ebola virus in Africa, as well as HIV/AIDS victims, has concluded that the current swine flu virus possesses certain transmission “vectors” that suggest the new strain has been genetically-manufactured as a military biological warfare weapon.

The UN expert believes that Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and the current A-H1N1 swine flu virus are biological warfare agents.

In addition, Army criminal investigators are looking into the possibility that disease samples are missing from biolabs at Fort Detrick — the same Army research lab from which the 2001 anthrax strain was released, according to a recent article in the Fredrick News Post.13 In February, the top biodefense lab halted all its research into Ebola, anthrax, plague, and other diseases known as “select agents,” after they discovered virus samples that weren’t listed in its inventory and might have been switched with something else.


1 World Health Organization, Epidemic and Pandemic Alert Response, Current WHO Phase of Pandemic Alert, http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/phase/en/index.html

6 CDC, Lightning-Associated Deaths 1980-1995, http://wonder.cdc.gov/wonder/PrevGuid/m0052833/m0052833.asp

15 Nature Precedings, hdl:10101/npre.2009.2832.1, Emergence and Fixing of Antiviral Resistance in Influenza A Via Recombination and Hitch Hiking, Henry L. Niman, http://precedings.nature.com/documents/2832/version/1

Read Full Post »

Epidemic Influenza And Vitamin D By J. J. Cannell

Main Category: Flu / SARS News
Article Date: 15 Sep 2006 – 0:00 PST

In early April of 2005, after a particularly rainy spring, an influenza epidemic (epi: upon, demic: people) exploded through the maximum-security hospital for the criminally insane where I have worked for the last ten years. It was not the pandemic (pan: all, demic: people) we all fear, just an epidemic. The world is waiting and governments are preparing for the next pandemic. A severe influenza pandemic will kill many more Americans than died in the World Trade Centers, the Iraq war, the Vietnam War, and Hurricane Katrina combined, perhaps a million people in the USA alone. Such a disaster would tear the fabric of American society. Our entire country might resemble the Superdome or Bourbon Street after Hurricane Katrina.

It’s only a question of when a pandemic will come, not if it will come. Influenza A pandemics come every 30 years or so, severe ones every hundred years or so. The last pandemic, the Hong Kong flu, occurred in 1968 – killing 34,000 Americans. In 1918, the Great Flu Epidemic killed more than 500,000 Americans. So many millions died in other countries, they couldn’t bury the bodies. Young healthy adults, in the prime of their lives in the morning, drowning in their own inflammation by noon, grossly discolored by sunset, were dead at midnight. Their body’s own broad-spectrum natural antibiotics, called antimicrobial peptides, seemed nowhere to be found. An overwhelming immune response to the influenza virus – white blood cells releasing large amounts of inflammatory agents called cytokines and chemokines into the lungs of the doomed – resulted in millions of deaths in 1918.

As I am now a psychiatrist, and no longer a general practitioner, I was not directly involved in fighting the influenza epidemic in our hospital. However, our internal medicine specialists worked overtime as they diagnosed and treated a rapidly increasing number of stricken patients. Our Chief Medical Officer quarantined one ward after another as more and more patients were gripped with the chills, fever, cough, and severe body aches that typifies the clinical presentation of influenza A.

Epidemic influenza kills a million people in the world every year by causing pneumonia, “the captain of the men of death.” These epidemics are often explosive; the word influenza comes from Italian (Medieval Latin ?nfluentia) or influence, because of the belief that the sudden and abrupt epidemics were due to the influence of some extraterrestrial force. One seventeenth century observer described it well when he wrote, “suddenly a Distemper arose, as if sent by some blast from the stars, which laid hold on very many together: that in some towns, in the space of a week, above a thousand people fell sick together.”

I guess our hospital was under luckier stars as only about 12% of our patients were infected and no one died. However, as the epidemic progressed, I noticed something unusual. First, the ward below mine was infected, and then the ward on my right, left, and across the hall – but no patients on my ward became ill. My patients had intermingled with patients from infected wards before the quarantines. The nurses on my unit cross-covered on infected wards. Surely, my patients were exposed to the influenza A virus. How did my patients escape infection from what some think is the most infectious of all the respiratory viruses?

My patients were no younger, no healthier, and in no obvious way different from patients on other wards. Like other wards, my patients are mostly African Americans who came from the same prisons and jails as patients on the infected wards. They were prescribed a similar assortment of powerful psychotropic medications we use throughout the hospital to reduce the symptoms of psychosis, depression, and violent mood swings and to try to prevent patients from killing themselves or attacking other patients and the nursing staff. If my patients were similar to the patients on all the adjoining wards, why didn’t even one of my patients catch the flu?

A short while later, a group of scientists from UCLA published a remarkable paper in the prestigious journal, Nature. The UCLA group confirmed two other recent studies, showing that a naturally occurring steroid hormone – a hormone most of us take for granted – was, in effect, a potent antibiotic. Instead of directly killing bacteria and viruses, the steroid hormone under question increases the body’s production of a remarkable class of proteins, called antimicrobial peptides. The 200 known antimicrobial peptides directly and rapidly destroy the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including the influenza virus, and play a key role in keeping the lungs free of infection. The steroid hormone that showed these remarkable antibiotic properties was plain old vitamin D.

All of the patients on my ward had been taking 2,000 units of vitamin D every day for several months or longer. Could that be the reason none of my patients caught the flu? I then contacted Professors Reinhold Vieth and Ed Giovannucci and told them of my observations. They immediately advised me to collect data from all the patients in the hospital on 2,000 units of vitamin D, not just the ones on my ward, to see if the results were statistically significant. It turns out that the observations on my ward alone were of borderline statistical significance and could have been due to chance alone. Administrators at our hospital agreed, and are still attempting to collect data from all the patients in the hospital on 2,000 or more units of vitamin D at the time of the epidemic.

Four years ago, I became convinced that vitamin D was unique in the vitamin world by virtue of three facts. First, it’s the only known precursor of a potent steroid hormone, calcitriol, or activated vitamin D. Most other vitamins are antioxidants or co-factors in enzyme reactions. Activated vitamin D – like all steroid hormones – damasks the genome, turning protein production on and off, as your body requires. That is, vitamin D regulates genetic expression in hundreds of tissues throughout your body. This means it has as many potential mechanisms of action as genes it damasks.

Second, vitamin D does not exist in appreciable quantities in normal human diets. True, you can get several thousand units in a day if you feast on sardines for breakfast, herring for lunch and salmon for dinner. The only people who ever regularly consumed that much fish are peoples, like the Inuit, who live at the extremes of latitude. The milk (most) Americans depend on for their vitamin D contains no naturally occurring vitamin D (raw milk from grass-fed cows does); instead, the U.S. government requires fortified milk to be supplemented with vitamin D, but only with what we now know to be a paltry 100 units per eight-ounce glass.

The vitamin D steroid hormone system has always had its origins in the skin, not in the mouth. Until quite recently, when dermatologists and governments began warning us about the dangers of sunlight, humans made enormous quantities of vitamin D where humans have always made it, where naked skin meets the ultraviolet B radiation of sunlight. We just cannot get adequate amounts of vitamin D from our diet. If we don’t expose ourselves to ultraviolet light, we must get vitamin D from dietary supplements.

The third way vitamin D is different from other vitamins is the dramatic difference between natural vitamin D nutrition and the modern one. Today, most humans only make about a thousand units of vitamin D a day from sun exposure; many people, such as the elderly or African Americans, make much less than that. How much did humans normally make? A single, twenty-minute, full body exposure to summer sun will trigger the delivery of 20,000 units of vitamin D into the circulation of most people within 48 hours. Twenty thousand units, that’s the single most important fact about vitamin D. Compare that to the 100 units you get from a glass of milk, or the several hundred daily units the U.S. government recommend as “Adequate Intake.” It’s what we call an “order of magnitude” difference.

Humans evolved naked in sub-equatorial Africa, where the sun shines directly overhead much of the year and where our species must have obtained tens of thousands of units of vitamin D every day, in spite of our skin developing heavy melanin concentrations (racial pigmentation) for protecting the deeper layers of the skin. Even after humans migrated to temperate latitudes, where our skin rapidly lightened to allow for more rapid vitamin D production, humans worked outdoors. However, in the last three hundred years, we began to work indoors; in the last one hundred years, we began to travel inside cars; in the last several decades, we began to lather on sunblock and consciously avoid sunlight. All of these things lower vitamin D blood levels. The inescapable conclusion is that vitamin D levels in modern humans are not just low – they are aberrantly low.

About three years ago, after studying all I could about vitamin D, I began testing my patient’s vitamin D blood levels and giving them literature on vitamin D deficiency. All their blood levels were low, which is not surprising as vitamin D deficiency is practically universal among dark-skinned people who live at temperate latitudes. Furthermore, my patients come directly from prison or jail, where they get little opportunity for sun exposure. After finding out that all my patients had low levels, many profoundly low, I started educating them and offering to prescribe them 2,000 units of vitamin D a day, the U.S. government’s “Upper Limit.”

Could vitamin D be the reason none of my patients got the flu? In the last several years, dozens of medical studies have called attention to worldwide vitamin D deficiency, especially among African Americans and the elderly, the two groups most likely to die from influenza. Cancer, heart disease, stroke, autoimmune disease, depression, chronic pain, depression, gum disease, diabetes, hypertension, and a number of other diseases have recently been associated with vitamin D deficiency. Was it possible that influenza was as well?

Then I thought of three mysteries that I first learned in medical school at the University of North Carolina: (1) although the influenza virus exists in the population year-round, influenza is a wintertime illnesses; (2) children with vitamin D deficient rickets are much more likely to suffer from respiratory infections; (3) the elderly in most countries are much more likely to die in the winter than the summer (excess wintertime mortality), and most of that excess mortality, although listed as cardiac, is, in fact, due to influenza.

Could vitamin D explain these three mysteries, mysteries that account for hundreds of thousands of deaths every year? Studies have found the influenza virus is present in the population year-around; why is it a wintertime illness? Even the common cold got its name because it is common in cold weather and rare in the summer. Vitamin D blood levels are at their highest in the summer but reach their lowest levels during the flu and cold season. Could such a simple explanation explain these mysteries?

The British researcher, Dr. R. Edgar Hope-Simpson, was the first to document the most mysterious feature of epidemic influenza, its wintertime surfeit and summertime scarcity. He theorized that an unknown “seasonal factor” was at work, a factor that might be affecting innate human immunity. Hope-Simpson was a general practitioner who became famous in the late 1960’s after he discovered the cause of shingles. British authorities bestowed every prize they had on him, not only because of the importance of his discovery, but because he made the discovery own his own, without the benefit of a university appointment, and without any formal training in epidemiology (the detective branch of medicine that methodically searches for clues about the cause of disease).

After his work on shingles, Hope-Simpson spent the rest of his working life studying influenza. He concluded a “seasonal factor” was at work, something that was regularly and predictably impairing human immunity in the winter and restoring it in the summer. He discovered that communities widely separated by longitude, but which shared similar latitude, would simultaneously develop influenza. He discovered that influenza epidemics in Great Britain in the 17th and 18th century occurred simultaneously in widely separated communities, before modern transportation could possibly explain its rapid dissemination. Hope-Simpson concluded a “seasonal factor” was triggering these epidemics. Whatever it was, he was certain that the deadly “crop” of influenza that sprouts around the winter solstice was intimately involved with solar radiation. Hope-Simpson predicted that, once discovered, the “seasonal factor” would “provide the key to understanding most of the influenza problems confronting us.”

Hope-Simpson had no way of knowing that vitamin D has profound effects on human immunity, no way of knowing that it increases production of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides, peptides that quickly destroy the influenza virus. We have only recently learned how vitamin D increases production of antimicrobial peptides while simultaneously preventing the immune system from releasing too many inflammatory cells, called chemokines and cytokines, into infected lung tissue.

In 1918, when medical scientists did autopsies on some of the fifty million people who died during the 1918 flu pandemic, they were amazed to find destroyed respiratory tracts; sometimes these inflammatory cytokines had triggered the complete destruction of the normal epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract. It was as if the flu victims had been attacked and killed by their own immune systems. This is the severe inflammatory reaction that vitamin D has recently been found to prevent.

I subsequently did what physicians have done for centuries. I experimented, first on myself and then on my family, trying different doses of vitamin D to see if it has any effects on viral respiratory infections. After that, as the word spread, several of my medical colleagues experimented on themselves by taking three-day courses of pharmacological doses (2,000 units per kilogram per day) of vitamin D at the first sign of the flu. I also asked numerous colleagues and friends who were taking physiological doses of vitamin D (5,000 units per day in the winter and less, or none, in the summer) if they ever got colds or the flu, and, if so, how severe the infections were. I became convinced that physiological doses of vitamin D reduce the incidence of viral respiratory infections and that pharmacological doses significantly ameliorate the symptoms of some viral respiratory infections if taken early in the course of the illness. However, such observations are so personal, so likely to be biased, that they are worthless science.

As I waited for the hospital to finish collecting data from all the patients taking vitamin D at the time of the outbreak – to see if it really reduced the incidence of influenza – I decided to research the literature thoroughly, finding all the clues in the world’s medical literature that indicated if vitamin D played any role in preventing influenza or other viral respiratory infections. I worked on the paper for over a year, writing it with Professor Edward Giovannucci of Harvard, Professor Reinhold Vieth of the University of Toronto, Professor Michael Holick of Boston University, Professor Cedric Garland of U.C., San Diego, as well as Dr. John Umhau of the National Institute of Health, Sasha Madronich of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, and Dr. Bill Grant at the Sunlight, Nutrition and Health Research Center. After numerous revisions, we submitted our paper to the same widely respected journal where Dr. Hope-Simpson published most of his work several decades ago.

Epidemiology and Infection, known as The Journal of Hygiene in Hope-Simpson’s day, recently published our paper. The editor, Professor Norman Noah, knew Dr. Hope-Simpson and helped tremendously with the paper. In the paper, we detailed our theory that vitamin D is Hope-Simpson’s long forgotten “seasonal stimulus.” We proposed that annual fluctuations in vitamin D levels explain the seasonality of influenza. The periodic seasonal fluctuations in 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, which cause recurrent and predictable wintertime vitamin D deficiency, predispose human populations to influenza epidemics. We raised the possibility that influenza is a symptom of vitamin D deficiency in the same way that an unusual form of pneumonia (pneumocystis carinii) is a symptom of AIDS. That is, we theorized that George Bernard Shaw was right when he said, “the characteristic microbe of a disease might be a symptom instead of a cause.”

In the paper, we propose that vitamin D explains the following 14 observations:

1. Why the flu predictably occurs in the months following the winter solstice, when vitamin D levels are at their lowest,

2. Why it disappears in the months following the summer solstice,

3. Why influenza is more common in the tropics during the rainy season,

4. Why the cold and rainy weather associated with El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which drives people indoors and lowers vitamin D blood levels, is associated with influenza,

5. Why the incidence of influenza is inversely correlated with outdoor temperatures,

6. Why children exposed to sunlight are less likely to get colds,

7. Why cod liver oil (which contains vitamin D) reduces the incidence of viral respiratory infections,

8. Why Russian scientists found that vitamin D-producing UVB lamps reduced colds and flu in schoolchildren and factory workers,

9. Why Russian scientists found that volunteers, deliberately infected with a weakened flu virus – first in the summer and then again in the winter – show significantly different clinical courses in the different seasons,

10. Why the elderly who live in countries with high vitamin D consumption, like Norway, are less likely to die in the winter,

11. Why children with vitamin D deficiency and rickets suffer from frequent respiratory infections,

12. Why an observant physician (Rehman), who gave high doses of vitamin D to children who were constantly sick from colds and the flu, found the treated children were suddenly free from infection,

13. Why the elderly are so much more likely to die from heart attacks in the winter rather than in the summer,

14. Why African Americans, with their low vitamin D blood levels, are more likely to die from influenza and pneumonia than Whites are.

Although our paper discusses the possibility that physiological doses of vitamin D (5,000 units a day) may prevent colds and the flu, and that physicians might find pharmacological doses of vitamin D (2,000 units per kilogram of body weight per day for three days) useful in treating some of the one million people who die in the world every year from influenza, we remind readers that it is only a theory. Like all theories, our theory must withstand attempts to be disproved with dispassionately conducted and well-controlled scientific experiments.

However, as vitamin D deficiency has repeatedly been associated with many of the diseases of civilization, we point out that it is not too early for physicians to aggressively diagnose and adequately treat vitamin D deficiency. We recommend that enough vitamin D be taken daily to maintain 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels at levels normally achieved through summertime sun exposure (50 ng/ml). For many persons, such as African Americans and the elderly, this will require up to 5,000 units daily in the winter and less, or none, in the summer, depending on summertime sun exposure.

By: J. J. Cannell

Acknowldegement: We wish to thank Professor Norman Noah of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Professor Robert Scragg of the University of Auckland and Professor Robert Heaney of Creighton University for reviewing the manuscript and making many useful suggestions.

— Dr. John Cannell, Atascadero State Hospital, 10333 El Camino Real, Atascadero, CA 93422, USA, 805 468-2061, jcannell@dmhash.state.ca.us
— Professor Reinhold Vieth, Mount Sinai Hospital, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
— Dr. John Umhau, Laboratory of Clinical and Translational Studies, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
— Professor Michael Holick, Departments of Medicine and Physiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
— Dr. Bill Grant, SUNARC, San Francisco, CA
— Dr. Sasha Madronich, Atmospheric Chemistry Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
— Professor Cedric Garland, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA
— Professor Edward Giovannucci, Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA


Cannell JJ, Vieth R, Umhau JC, Holick MF, Grant WB, Madronich S, Garland CF, and Giovanucci E. Epidemic Influenza and Vitamin D. Epidemiol Infect. 2006 Sep 7;:1-12 (Epub ahead of print)
Link Here.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »